target ceo case analysis

Managerial Functions

20% of total grade

Outstanding Achievement

Comprehensive and in-depth descriptions and examples of managerial functions were included and skillfully tied in with the elements of the case.

22

Very Good Work

All of the descriptions and examples of managerial functions were included and adequately linked to proper elements of the case.

18.7

Note: there is no number of pages, short 175 word answers

Average Work

The descriptions and examples of managerial functions were included, but were underdeveloped.

16.5

Unacceptable Work

The descriptions or examples of managerial functions were missing or inadequate

11


  • Managerial Challenges

    20% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Management challenges were thoroughly identified and skillful assessments were made. 22Very Good Work Management challenges were accurately identified and the assessment was well developed. 18.7Average Work Management challenges were identified, but the assessment was minimal. 16.5Unacceptable Work Management challenges were not properly identified or the assessment was illogical. 11


  • Management Viewpoint

    20% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Management viewpoint was thoroughly described and in-depth analysis was completed. 22Very Good Work Management viewpoint was identified and evaluation was appropriately accomplished. 18.7Average Work Management viewpoint was identified, but evaluation was not well developed. 16.5Unacceptable Work Management viewpoint was not identified or incorrectly identified and/or evaluation of success was not accomplished. 11


  • Target as a Learning Organization

    20% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement In-depth assessment was done with student demonstrating skillful analytical reasoning. 22Very Good Work Assessment was sufficiently accomplished. 18.7Average Work Assessment was minimally accomplished. 16.5Unacceptable Work Assessment not done or was done poorly. 11


  • Tone

    6% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Tone and level of discussion exemplify high level of ability to communicate in academic writing. 6.6Very Good Work Tone and level of discussion is at an appropriate level. 5.6Average Work Tone and level of discussion is approaching expected level, but writing should be elevated. 5Unacceptable Work Tone and level of discussion is not appropriate to the content and assignment. 3.3


  • Sentence Structure

    7% of total gradeOutstanding Achievement Answers are fully organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions are smooth and flow seamlessly from one point to the next. 7.7Very Good Work Answers are generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions for the most part are smooth. 6.5Average Work Answers are generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions, however, are awkward. 5.8Unacceptable Work Answers are organized in a logical or coherent manner but not both. 3.9


  • Grammar

    7% of total grade

  • Hi there, would you like us to help you do this question?

    We are professional assignment help service for students who can't even. Get your papers written starting at just $11.99 a page.

    Do my question How much will it cost?